If Humala wins on the ballot is just Peru and South America

Jose Brechner

Hugo Chavez begins a new club to join fascist left. Initial results are dark, the Nazi Ollanta Humala won the first round.

If his victory is consolidated in the second round, Peru would fall back to the Inca era similar to what is happening in Bolivia, with the difference that Humala, being smarter than Evo Morales, will be much more dangerous.

Humala moderated his discourse in recent times to become acceptable. In politics that's changing clothes. The content is the same.

Ollanta Humala is a Nazi, an admirer and follower of Adolf Hitler. The applicant mestizo severely self-conscious, it is believed a superior race.

Of all the candidates standing in this election - and boy there was variety - the Peruvians could not choose worse. At least in the first phase.

All economic progress is living the trash will go to Peru. Foreign investments managed trust with Alan Garcia, die.

The decaying process is striking because these same events are already happening in other countries where liberals rule. The best example is Argentina, where inflation is rising, the country every day produces less and few foreigners dare to invest in their land.

It is amazing that the blindness is so evil and that people do not see or learn from their own experience or that of the neighbor, but there is an explanation for this phenomenon has been studied by Doc Childre and Howard Martin, international experts in "collective stress" .

According to those experts: "The collective energy generated by the feelings, thoughts and attitudes of nearly seven billion people on the planet, creating an atmosphere or climate awareness '.' Surrounding us like the air we breathe, this consciousness climate affects us more strongly in our emotional and energetic levels. "

This is the only hormonal explanation coincides with the political phenomena that through time the world spread like a disease. Sometimes for good, as in the Republican era of liberation of the monarchies and sometimes for worse, as is currently the socialist totalitarianism.

Each country with its own nuances but equally populist philosophy is sinking and destroying himself, until the pendulum changes direction, not without leaving an economic cost and mournful.

The outcome in South America will be bloody. Never experienced such crime or assault street politics. The model encourages leftist violence. If you have not become more cruel is that the picketers are members of the rulers.

Humala was Chavez withdrew because the lieutenant colonel publicly is at its lowest popularity, but nobody knows if you are sending secret love letters.

In Peru indigenous populist line, the only one of the countries liberated by Simon Bolivar is in the category of intelligent, Colombia.

If Hugo Chavez in his desperation to stay in power for the military confrontation with Bogota, will encounter the powerful Colombian army supported by the United States. The violence spread across the continent as in the era libertarian.

Barack Obama is not the Bolivar or San Martin to come out to impose order, freedom, justice and respect for the law, and we do not see any in Latin America, except Juan Manuel Santos, who speak loudly.

It is likely that the future of Latin America in the hands of Colombia and Chile, you can not dodge the claws of its neighbor Peru if Humala victory consolidates.

Brazil is a mystery, Dilma Rousseff, contrary to predictions, is behaving much more sensibly and intelligence Lula da Silva, but only recently started. The above extremely bleak past to speculate on what will be its action in the medium and long term.

www.josebrechner.com